Georgia’s six month residency requirement is a limit on the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, not a box to check in the complaint.
The Consequence of Missing It
In Crittenden v. Crittenden, 354 Ga. App. 672 (2020), the Court of Appeals framed it this way: because the husband “failed to meet his burden of showing that he was domiciled in Georgia for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint, the trial court did not err in dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”
That is a different kind of defect than a poorly drafted pleading. A pleading problem can be amended. A court that lacks subject matter jurisdiction cannot grant the divorce at all.
It Survives a Default
Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk, 286 Ga. 589 (2010), shows how late the issue can surface. The husband was served in Florida and never filed an answer. After the trial court entered a final decree, he attacked it on the ground that his wife had not been a Georgia resident for six months. The Georgia Supreme Court treated that challenge as raising “the issue of jurisdiction over the subject matter” and analyzed it as a motion to set aside under OCGA 9-11-60(d)(1).
He lost on the record he made, because his wife’s verified complaint alleged her residency and he filed nothing to contradict it. The point is that the door was open to him at all.
A Decree Can Be Set Aside
In Rice v. Rice, 223 Ga. 363 (1967), the record of a divorce case contained none of the required jurisdictional residence allegations. The Georgia Supreme Court held the resulting judgment “void” and that the petition to set it aside “should have been granted.”
So allege your residency, and be prepared to prove it.
Contact Us
This post is a quick overview of the law and is not intended as legal advice. Please feel free to contact our office for a consultation if you have questions about this or any other legal aspects regarding your case!